Happy 2011 from Punya Mishra on Vimeo.
Collage of all that is happening within and without. Changes that we are undergoing both within ourselves and the world at large - from meditation, past life regression, to globalization, localization, environmental pollution, human rights et al. From Noetic Sciences to Particle Physics and exploring the synergy and commonality between the two.
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Stop Motion Vedio by Punya Mishra
INDIA IN UN SECURITY COUNCIL IMPORTANT FOR GLOBAL BALANCE : SARKOZY |
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Kala Jatha - Sainda High School
Check the link below for the photograpphs.
Global Bench Mark in Diaspora Philantropy
- AIF earned its selection as a global benchmark in diaspora philanthropy due to its many scalable innovations and organizational efficiency. AIF has created high impact results through alignment with government objectives and advantageous partnerships with corporate sponsors, achieved high return on resources through volunteer commitments and organizational efficiency, and attained high value-add best practices with training programs that empower India’s poor and disadvantaged by expanding their skill and knowledge base. By directing a majority of its resources to five signature programs - Digital Equalizer (DE), Learning and Migration Program (LAMP), Market Aligned Skills Training Program (MAST), Rickshaw Sangh and William J Clinton Fellowship.
- Digital Equalizer (DE) and the Learning and Migration Program (LAMP) are two examples of AIF’s high impact, high value-add innovations scaled-up exponentially through partnerships with government authorities and corporate sponsors. DE introduces computers and digital media as tools of empowerment in public schools. With corporate funding and government support in six regions, the program has reached nearly 600,000 students and 17,000 teachers across 1,470 schools. LAMP was made possible by partnering with the existing government initiative to Universalize Elementary Education (UEE). Since AIF motivated the government to include the neglected populations of children of seasonal and migrant workers into its National Education Program, LAMP has reached 237,504 children across India. Overall, AIF leverages every US$1 raised in the United States with US$6-US$10 from the Indian Government, foundations and corporations, exponentially increasing the range and impact of its programs.
- AIF achieves high return on resources through volunteer commitments by highly accomplished professionals and passionate staffers, thereby maintaining low fundraising and overhead costs.
- Through its high value-add global best practice training programs, AIF makes long-lasting, generative impact on its grantees.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
DE Orissa Picnic
http://picasaweb.google.com/subrat305/DEOrissaPicnic?feat=directlink
Friday, December 10, 2010
Sapna to Apna Rickshaw
Check out the link below to read an interesting article on AIF's "Rickshaw Sangh" by Usha Rai.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Baseline - Upper Primary and Secondary Schools
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Design for Change Contest
Monday, November 22, 2010
Diagnostic Labels - A Boon or a Bane
Saturday, November 20, 2010
AYV Lite Training Program
Friday, November 19, 2010
Best Diaspora Philanthropic Organizations Worldwide Selected
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Sishu Mahotsav
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Second International Conference on Excellence in School Education - 26th - 28th October, IIT Delhi
http://www.box.net/shared/08cjp4g4tc
Saturday, October 9, 2010
ML Education Research Network I
- Do any contemplative resources regarding mental training for children and adolescents in the Sanskritic traditions of India exist?
- What does science tell us about the prospects for the cultivation of self-regulatory skills such as impulse control, and interpersonal skills such as empathic listening in children, adolescents, and emerging adults through various kinds of mental and physical training?
- What are the social-emotional, attentional and interpersonal skills young people need today, in addition to their academic skills and knowledge, to be successful, happy and socially-responsible members of school first, and society and the global community later? How can we cultivate these same social-emotional, attentional, and interpersonal skills in educators and parents so they can serve as positive role models for young people in these regards?
- Might contemplative practices have anything to offer with respect to the mental training of “21st century skills” in young people and educators and parents alike – those that foster calming and centering, concentration, clarity, compassion, and interpersonal and intercultural ease of presence?
- How can we design age-appropriate measures of these kinds of 21st century skills so we can measure their development all across the lifespan and in the context of interventions that employ contemplative practices?
- What are promising extant programs for children, adolescents, emerging adults and educations that could serve as “testbeds” for the development of measures and preliminary studies of the efficacy and effectiveness of such programs?
- What are the risks and cautionary tales of history we should be aware of as we explore the idea of introducing mindfulness and compassion practices in secular cultural settings like public schools?
Three Pilot Studies Were Funded as part of MLERN I:
- Amishi Jha, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania
Developing age-appropriate attention and working memory measures for use in mindfulness-based training with children and adolescents - Mark Greenberg, Ph.D., Penn State and Tamar Mendelson, Ph.D., M.A., Johns Hopkins University
Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth - Robert W. Roeser, Ph.D., Portland State University and Kim Schonert-Reichl, Ph.D., University of British Columbia
Testing the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of a mindfulness-based professional development program for public school teacher
ML Education Research Network I
The Mind and Life Education Research Network (MLERN I) was formed in 2006 to create a multidisciplinary intellectual forum dedicated to exploring issues at the intersection of mind, brain, education and contemplative practice. This intersection was very novel; there was little in the way of systematic developmental-educational thinking in the Buddhist traditions despite interesting sets of practices such as debate in the training of young monks. Because of this, a primary agenda of MLERN became scientific and intellectual dialogue and discovery. A primary goal of the network for the entire three years was to explore, from various scientific, applied and contemplative perspectives, with various assembled groups of individuals, questions such as:
- Do any contemplative resources regarding mental training for children and adolescents in the Sanskritic traditions of India exist?
- What does science tell us about the prospects for the cultivation of self-regulatory skills such as impulse control, and interpersonal skills such as empathic listening in children, adolescents, and emerging adults through various kinds of mental and physical training?
- What are the social-emotional, attentional and interpersonal skills young people need today, in addition to their academic skills and knowledge, to be successful, happy and socially-responsible members of school first, and society and the global community later? How can we cultivate these same social-emotional, attentional, and interpersonal skills in educators and parents so they can serve as positive role models for young people in these regards?
- Might contemplative practices have anything to offer with respect to the mental training of “21st century skills” in young people and educators and parents alike – those that foster calming and centering, concentration, clarity, compassion, and interpersonal and intercultural ease of presence?
- How can we design age-appropriate measures of these kinds of 21st century skills so we can measure their development all across the lifespan and in the context of interventions that employ contemplative practices?
- What are promising extant programs for children, adolescents, emerging adults and educations that could serve as “testbeds” for the development of measures and preliminary studies of the efficacy and effectiveness of such programs?
- What are the risks and cautionary tales of history we should be aware of as we explore the idea of introducing mindfulness and compassion practices in secular cultural settings like public schools?
Three Pilot Studies Were Funded as part of MLERN I:
- Amishi Jha, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania
Developing age-appropriate attention and working memory measures for use in mindfulness-based training with children and adolescents - Mark Greenberg, Ph.D., Penn State and Tamar Mendelson, Ph.D., M.A., Johns Hopkins University
Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth - Robert W. Roeser, Ph.D., Portland State University and Kim Schonert-Reichl, Ph.D., University of British Columbia
Testing the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of a mindfulness-based professional development program for public school teacher
Looks interesting. I will definitely like to lay my hands on this at the earliest.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
DE Vs Non-DE - A Comparative Study
Summary of findings:
- Overall pass percentage in Mathematics in DE schools is 89.06% while in case of Non-DE schools it is 66.27
- Overall pass percentage in Science in DE schools is 88.49% while in case of Non-DE schools it is 65.50
- Overall pass percentage in English in DE schools is 85.78% while in case of Non-DE schools it is 64.97
- Overall pass percentage in Mathematics in DE schools is 59.80% while in case of Non-DE schools it is 36.60
- Overall pass percentage in Science in DE schools is 65.69% while in case of Non-DE schools it is 40.42
- Overall pass percentage in English in DE schools is 56.18% while in case of Non-DE schools it is 36.84
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Zonal Centre - Western Zone
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
the secret
Monday, September 13, 2010
Sensitization Workshops
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1i9PlC9m4qaIXgYhrYpVURjVnzXBhWCqFWR-VnTEbDZQi_1sfDixAUTj9B4fv3yuuSFke-8HxUaUuxxDKo0GMXOmLbsnuq5760sBlMPc3kvRy4PQu94aaTpPSjNyf69Js1iOfNJU8HIeE/s320/2-SBP.jpg)
Friday, August 13, 2010
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
State Resource Centre - SCERT
A total of 322 people comprising of 119 district level functionaries of the education department, 136 teacher educators and 67 education department personnel from the state level, comprising of Additional Secretaries, Joint Secretaries, Deputy Secretaries and Junior Level Staff .
Monday, July 26, 2010
Resource Centre Training Model
To read more on the new model try out the link below:
http://rapidshare.com/files/409158662/Resource_Centre_Model.pdf
Subrat
26th July 2010
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Deploying ICTs in Schools: A framework for identifying and assessing technology options, their benefits, feasibility and total cost of ownership
Kasauli
Friday, July 23, 2010
ILTM Refresher - Chandigarh
Thursday, July 22, 2010
DE Core Group Meeting - New Delhi
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Dead Shark
Monday, July 12, 2010
Sensitization Workshop - Southern Zone
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Technology in School Education: To Outsource ICT or Not « Educational Technology Debate
A very interesting piece of write up on Outsourced versus Integrated Apparoach in Computer Aided Learning, which brings out in stark contrast the advantages of an Integrated Model like the ICT @ Schools Program in Kerala, over and above a Vendor Driven Model like the Mahiti Sindhu Program in Karnataka. The advantaged of a Integrated Model needs to be seriously considered by Policy Makers and Practioners alike while planning to implement a Computer Aided Learning Program in large scale mode. The model has clearly discernable benefits as mentioned below:
1. Higher level of teacher engagement
2. Integration of Computer Learning with regular learning processes
3. Greater per-learner availability of computers
4. Significant cost efficiencies and development of teacher networks
5. Collaborative content creation processes, which support teacher professional development
Friday, June 25, 2010
Right to Education Act- Challenges of access and use of ICT to accelerate goals - Advice, Examples
- How could ICTS be used to implementation the RTE to enable access to the target age of six to fourteen years. Are there any examples that can be studied?
- There are many technologies ranging from computers to mobiles today, which offer possible solutions. Could members provide solutions of the most appropriate technology to reduce the cost of implementing the RTE by State Governments?
- Are there any examples of use of ICT in education, which would enable quality learning at a large scale and at an affordable cost.